Recent events have caused me to reflect on the nature of leadership. The following reflections are incomplete and are not meant to be exhaustive. They are general principles, not "how-to's." I am sure there are many resources available I could have drawn upon, but these principles are based primarily on my personal experience and observations. I may continue to revise these principles, and welcome the input and ideas of my readers.
Good leadership places the good of the group ahead of the good of the leader. It encourages the expression and consideration of diverse viewpoints. It draws upon the talents and wisdom of those led. It understands the position and needs of the group within its larger environment. It fosters the growth and well-being of the group's individual members and of those who rely upon it. It respects individual freedom while seeking the common good. Good leadership is thoughtful and strategic. It is proactive, not reactive. It takes no offense at criticism, but responds to criticism in positive ways. It is strong but kind. It seeks to build up, not tear down. It is accompanied by clear vision.
Bad leadership places the good of the leader above the good of the group. It imposes the leader's views on others and stifles dissent. It disregards the talents of the group's members and expects them to follow without input or participation. It treats the group as an island, disassociated from its environment. It ignores the needs of individual members and those affected by it. It sacrifices individuals' freedom to the leader's concept of the common good. Bad leadership relies on emotion over reason. It reacts to situations but does not shape them. It rejects criticism and lashes out or ignores its critics. It is weak, unkind and destructive. It lacks vision.
Good leadership places the good of the group ahead of the good of the leader. It encourages the expression and consideration of diverse viewpoints. It draws upon the talents and wisdom of those led. It understands the position and needs of the group within its larger environment. It fosters the growth and well-being of the group's individual members and of those who rely upon it. It respects individual freedom while seeking the common good. Good leadership is thoughtful and strategic. It is proactive, not reactive. It takes no offense at criticism, but responds to criticism in positive ways. It is strong but kind. It seeks to build up, not tear down. It is accompanied by clear vision.
Bad leadership places the good of the leader above the good of the group. It imposes the leader's views on others and stifles dissent. It disregards the talents of the group's members and expects them to follow without input or participation. It treats the group as an island, disassociated from its environment. It ignores the needs of individual members and those affected by it. It sacrifices individuals' freedom to the leader's concept of the common good. Bad leadership relies on emotion over reason. It reacts to situations but does not shape them. It rejects criticism and lashes out or ignores its critics. It is weak, unkind and destructive. It lacks vision.
Comments
Post a Comment